OT: very much so, and for the final time

[David B.]

On 07/01/2019 23:11, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*! :-(

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:30:52 +0000, "David B." <"David

Remember what I've told you before? You cannot be an EX-VXer, any more
so than one can be an EX-MURDERER. When caught, you MUST be punished!

What you just did is a criminal offence. You accused someone
of being a criminal today, for something he allegedly did as a
teenager and prescribed a decade ago.

Dustin Cook has been involved in illegal activity *all of his adult life*.

Your murder by STALKING of a depressed person to the point of
suicide is not covered by ANY statute of limitations. It will always
be punishable crime.

That's EXACTLY what Dustin Cook has been doing *for all his years on
Usenet*.

Gloating about his death by repeatedly posting his obituary
will probably not help your defense much.

How about a MID to support your claim that ~BD~ ever did such a thing?

Don't bother - I never, ever, did such a thing.

Want to know BD better before giving up any personal info that
he will promise (put his hand on the bible and hope to die stuff) not
to put online, and then post to a dozen forums, your family and your
workplace ?

Again, complete BULLSHIT, Shadow. But that is EXACTLY what DUSTIN COOK
has done all of his Usenet life - and is STILL doing!

[Diesel]

someone close to you unless you kept a very tight lid on things.
I still don't know if raid and Sammi More are the same entity so
what chance would I have with you?

I can clear that up for you. Sam and myself are not the same
person. Sam's roughly 50 years or so older then me. :) I did not
show nor tell him anything about Raid (me), he found that
information on his own thanks to his great grandson. Sam is a
curious sort of fellow, but he's a very nice guy.
How do I know Sam you might ask? As he had no trouble telling you
(thanks.. heh) we initially met online in an mp3 exchange place.
I was able to find something he wanted. He lives nearby, so I
went and visited him. No harm done. He had some spyware issues on
his computer, so I removed them while I was there.
Regards,
Dustin Cook

So good to know that you were a 'nice guy' back then! :-)

I still am.

Confirmation, too, that you are, indeed, the VXer called Raid!

David, You confirmed that in 2007. I told you I was Raid, in 2007.

Remember what I've told you before? You cannot be an EX-VXer, any
more so than one can be an EX-MURDERER. When caught, you MUST be
punished!

David, I haven't authored a single virus since 2000. That's 19 years
ago, now. I *AM* an EX VXER. It's daft of you, to say the least to
compare virus writing to that of murdering an individual.

You had no problems with my background in 2007, David. What made you
decide I needed to be punished for something I was already out of a
full seven years prior to your first email? Especially considering
that you didn't indicate you had any problem with me until several
years later, when you tried to dox me for refusing to help you harass
other people.

http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/david.txt

If you want the signature to remain out of use and no further action
taken against you, I expect the url to your blog to be down by
tomorrow afternoon. If you continue to leave the blog online to spite
me, I'll make a phone call and get the ball rolling to bring this to
the next level for you. Your choice, as always.

[Diesel]

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:30:52 +0000, "David B." <"David

Remember what I've told you before? You cannot be an EX-VXer, any
more so than one can be an EX-MURDERER. When caught, you MUST be
punished!

What you just did is a criminal offence. You accused someone
of being a criminal today, for something he allegedly did as a
teenager and prescribed a decade ago.

Nearly two decades ago, actually.

Want to know BD better before giving up any personal info
that
he will promise (put his hand on the bible and hope to die stuff)
not to put online, and then post to a dozen forums, your family
and your workplace ?

Don't forget, if you ever write something he doesn't want others to
know, he'll blackmail you into removing it with a bullshit blog or
fake facebook page. And, if/when you comply with his blackmailing,
the blog and/or fake facebook page remains up. He doesn't make any
effort to fix things on his end.

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
[]'s

BTS was a fool, imo, to give into Davids demands concerning the
picture's removal. David has no legal standing to have that happen,
and as we can all see, Davids threats to blackmail occur regardless
of whether or not you comply with his blackmail demands.

I changed the signature for days, David danced around killing the
blog. He has no intentions of doing so, but, he expects me to forgo
using my original signature?

[Diesel]

Post by David B.
On 07/01/2019 23:11, Shadow *LIED* - *AGAIN*! :-(

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:30:52 +0000, "David B." <"David

Remember what I've told you before? You cannot be an EX-VXer,
any more so than one can be an EX-MURDERER. When caught, you
MUST be punished!

What you just did is a criminal offence. You accused someone
of being a criminal today, for something he allegedly did as a
teenager and prescribed a decade ago.

Dustin Cook has been involved in illegal activity *all of his
adult life*.

That's another lie.

Post by David B.

Your murder by STALKING of a depressed person to the point of
suicide is not covered by ANY statute of limitations. It will
always be punishable crime.

That's EXACTLY what Dustin Cook has been doing *for all his years
on Usenet*.

That's another lie. Pure slime on your part.

Post by David B.

Want to know BD better before giving up any personal info that
he will promise (put his hand on the bible and hope to die stuff)
not to put online, and then post to a dozen forums, your family
and your workplace ?

Again, complete BULLSHIT, Shadow. But that is EXACTLY what DUSTIN
COOK has done all of his Usenet life - and is STILL doing!

Not complete bullshit. You've shared an email I sent you on your blog
for christs sake. You don't know much about my 'usenet' life, being as
you didn't even begin corresponding with me until 2007! And, during the
time of your emails, you HAD NO PROBLEM WITH MY PAST. Infact, my past
was the reason you reached out to me. You mistakenly! thought you could
USE ME to cause aggravation for others you have a problem with.

It was ONLY WHEN YOU COULDN'T USE ME that you decided I was a problem,
and you tried to dox me on usenet for my refusal to do shit things for
your benefit. You danced around the problem with having done that for
two years. And, then, when YOU GOT DOX'd, you decided, hey, that wasn't
fair; now I have a problem with you. You created the problem you have
with me and you continue to keep the issue going.

[Diesel]

"David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> news:2qRYD.6124$***@fx24.fr7 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 23:38:38 GMT in
alt.2600, wrote:

[snip]


Dustin is full of bluster, but he's not the total dirtbag you're
making him out to be. For that, you need to look to BD. With Dustin,
what you see is what you get--he's not a sneak, even when he isn't
doing quite the right thing. Note that not doing quite the right
thing is not quite the same as doing something outright wrong.

Would you care to threaten me? I doubt you're that stupid, but
there is always hope. I would love nothing more than to see your
ass locked-up with the rest of the sociopath's before you really
do physically harm someone.

The person who needs to be locked up is BD, not Dustin. At worst,
Dustin would now and again benefit if a friend would endeavor to
duct-tape his fingers together long enough to give him time to think
it through before he types. Nonetheless, he doesn't sit around
plotting about how he's going to drag someone through the mud. In
other words, he's a little impulsive, but he isn't evil. BD, on the
other hand, is a manipulative, conniving sociopath.

FYI, I have not followed any of this--I have bigger fish to fry
right now--but I had a free moment this evening, and I thought this
post worth commenting on.

And no, Dustin is not my favorite person in the world by any stretch
of the imagination, but fair is fair. And your assessment of him is
simply not fair.