"David B." <***@nomail.afraid.org>
news:og1029$n13$***@dont-email.me Tue, 23 May 2017 09:43:52 GMT in
alt.2600, wrote:
> On 5/23/2017 1:45 AM, Diesel wrote:
>> "David B." <***@nomail.afraid.org>
>> news:ofv65e$ap3$***@dont-email.me Mon, 22 May 2017 17:15:40 GMT in
>> alt.2600, wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/22/2017 5:36 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus
>>> รยฐร
ลพรยรยถรยงรยฌรขยยบ wrote:
>>>
>>>> some people like to make broken analogies, thinking they don't
>>>> look like twits. :/
>>>
>>> Dustin Cook - aka Diesel - *IS* a TWIT!
>>>
>>
>> Score one for the good guys!
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkcrTBG_M-Y&feature=em-comments
>>
>> They honored my copyright David. video has been deleted!
>
> It's good to know, categorically, that 'Diesel' *IS* Dustin Cook!
[fair warning for those who have the attention span of a goldfish;
this reply is a long taunting 'wordwall']
David,
I announced who I was when I began using this handle, nearly two
years ago. I made no effort to conceal my identity with it. I did
that for a few reasons. One of which being, I didn't want anyone to
think I was trying to avoid any filters they might have set on me. I
don't mind people filtering me if I annoy them, I'm completely okay
with it. I make it a point to keep the 'email' address the same to
make such filtering, easier.
Another reason I went with the handle Diesel is because it's a very
common word and makes things a little more difficult for the
anoncoward stalker. And, my fqdn line (I had to point it out to you,
because you and whoever you begged to checkout the source code I
shared wasn't as tech savvy as they led you to believe, not only did
they not give you a good explanation of what the source was doing,
they couldn't figure out what it did as a complete program either.
You seriously need to find more competent people)
Despite the fact my name is certainly Dustin Cook, It's not that
uncommon of a name online anymore. I had trouble finding myself on a
couple of databases. No kidding. A few people have the same year,
age, and middle initial as myself, too. And, damn if they didn't live
in some of the same states. I looked up two Dustins this morning
thinking they were me, only to find out, I don't know ANY of the
people they 'might' be related to and although we had several states
in common, I've never set foot in several of the others listed, and,
since geography was never my best subject in school, I couldn't tell
you where they are in relation to my location without using a map.
*shrug*
I do find your effort to spin another fight you lost with me into an
attempt to learn my actual meatspace for continued
stalking,blackmail, and intimidation efforts, though.
Fact is, you didn't think google would 'intervene' as you put it and
delete the video. You were wrong. Dropbox would actually do the same
thing to you, If I felt the need to pursue the matter. But, what's
the point. At the end of the day, you're going to retain copies of my
stuff and abuse what you have as you see fit. All because, I wouldn't
help you stalk other people that I don't know. Heh, that's my reward
for being a good guy and not doing blackhat things for hire. And you
call yourself a good guy and christian. ROFL!
You're a christian in the sense of the crusades kind of christian,
and/or one of the modern priests the churchs have to hide by parish
relocation because they can't leave children alone in a sexual way.
They aren't good guys either.
I don't expect anyone to just take what i've written about your
activities on my word alone. Especially the people in
rec.photo.digital. That's why I continue to host our entire email
correspondence on my BugHunter programs domain.
http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bdemail1.zip
Not to worry David, you've snowballed them good, they have no idea
what kind of person you actually are. And! several of them are scared
to death of downloading and unzipping the file on the url above. They
think the simple act of downloading and! or unzipping it will give
them something and/or otherwise pose a risk to their machines.
Photography experts some of them may be, but, IT intelligence leaves
MUCH to be desired. They are of the 'computer is like a toaster
oven' mentality.
And, laughingly, atleast one thinks I have an axe to grind with you.
ROFL! They have no idea you started shit with me because I wouldn't
help you stalk other people. Long before I ever responded in a
hostile manner. Two+ years long before. I told you, and our email
correspondence will confirm ALL of this,
As the saying goes, you can lead a horse to water, but, you can't
make him drink it.
I'd be more than happy to analyze any malicious file or url you sent
me, but, I wasn't going to scour the entire sites domain, and break
into it for full access for your benefit. All you had to do was
provide me a url and/or malicious file of some kind and I would have
examined it and reported back my findings as well as including a
signature for detection/removal into BugHunters database.
I told you this, several times. I extended you courtesy that you
didn't deserve, I was professional and quite civil with you the
entire time, although I already knew that you were discussing myself
and my program behind my back, trying to learn more about ME in
particular. Not my program.
You didn't actually email me because you wanted to know more about
the program, You wanted to know more about me, and, thought you could
snooker me if you inquired about the program and convinced me to
trust you a bit. I never fell for it. Everything I told you via email
was already known, and, I had no problems confirming it for you. As I
told you via email, I changed my 'evil ways' for the better. So I
figured I could prove that I was a good guy by being completely
honest and candid with you via email; even going so far as to answer
your personal questions that had nothing to do with my program.
You didn't contact me out of the blue either. You read some old shit
about some of the things I did, and wrongly assumed I would be the
same person you read about, and help you get back at two specific
forum administrators that banned you from their sites. It was never
about my program. You just thought it would be your way in, to earn
my trust, and eventually ask your favors. And, you figured, we'd be
friends enough by then, that I actually would do that stuff for you.
When you realized that you wouldn't be succesful, you proceeded to
create a gsv of an address someone else posted, create fresh threads
in several different newsgroups, to try and force me to help you out.
You were sure bad guys hungout on those servers, and, you thought
that if you placed myself and/or family in harms way, I'd 'smarten
up' and do your bidding. You were wrong.
I'm not surprised you haven't shared the screenshot you have with my
name on Malwarebytes Antimalware scanner. I understand why you'd
prefer not to do that for that newsgroup though, especially when you
tried (and failed) to abuse a retired police officer to do something
to me for you.
MID: <C87RA.739350$***@fx27.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100
Do, please, read the WHOLE thread started by Mr Cook - called "Wanna
torrent? :)" - on the 'alt.computer.workshop' group.
Just *HOW* can I 'hang him out to dry'? (if you catch my drift!)
You hijacked their thread when you posted that offtopic comment; It
had nothing to do with the discussion already in progress. And, the
only reason you participated was so that you could butter someone up
and ask them. You're *well known* for using that method of attack,
btw. I can spot it a mile away, it's so common for you.
Why is it okay for you to try and dox me multiple times; I think
you're at address number five, or is it six now? Along with stalking
me for years, but it's not okay for me to succesfully dox you (and
how)? Why is it not okay for me, or HHI, to do what we do, but it's
perfectly okay for you to violate others copyrights, as you
repeatedly do with not only myself, but others as well?
I don't understand your logic, David. Did your god or dog tell you
it's okay to treat others like shit, but, not okay for them to do you
a solid in return? Is that what you're going by? Between the bottles,
I mean. You do take a little break between finishing one off and
opening another, don't you?
Is your wife an enabler of your excessive drinking, or, does she
insist that if you want it, you get it yourself? IE: does she go and
get it for you just so she doesn't have to listen to you piss and
moan about it?
Maybe you can finally tell me why you accused me of hacking your
computers to learn about your drinking problem? Do you actually have
some sort of journal where you admit what a fuckup you actually are
to yourself? Do you have your medical records and history on any of
the computers? Did you think I took copies of either of the
aforementioned and learned about your problem as a result of that?
Why did you give people I don't know, but you do, irl, my email
address and discuss me with them? You know you actually scared one or
more of them? You gave them the impression I'm a movie like hacker
and could do anything on a whim to them. Like they do in the movies.
Movies aren't real life, David. And, hacking is a much more involved
(boring for the average individual watching a movie) process than
what the movies and tv shows make it appear.
> Have Google have also tied up your recent request to being from
> the same individual who asked for this image to be blurred out on
> a Google StreetView image?
tied up? As I told you when your friend Eagle originally inquired,
*I* had nothing whatsoever to do with the blurring. I don't even know
how to do that! it took me a few minutes to determine how to report
your illegal youtube upload.
In fact, prior to your little stunt, I didn't even have a youtube
'channel'; now, thanks to having to sign in to youtube vs google (for
email), I do. but, it has no content. I don't even know the url to
it. And, I don't plan to add any content, either. In case you haven't
noticed, shit for brains, wannabe stalker/'good guy', I'm not exactly
a big fan of cameras. I tend to avoid them, whenever possible. I've
never liked my picture being taken, I've yet to take a 'selfie'; and,
pending a very good reason for doing so, I'm not likely to, either.
You should be glad you got the chance to see me on video that
consists of little over a minute with myself actually taking up,
mebbe 15 seconds or so of that. I'm what you call, camera shy.
You just think I have an ego the size of a house. Because, as is so
typical for you, you're misinformed.
> http://goo.gl/maps/ZOKA9
The scripts kill this old box, David. It really doesn't handle modern
websites with a lot of scripts well at all. :( I'm still migrating my
stuff over to the faster machines, so, I can soon reload this one
with cent OS and turn it into a simple file server. Cent is likely
going to be overkill for my intentions, I could just use Linux Mint
with Samba, actually. I may go that route for consistency, but, since
I have CentOS7 iso, I was wanting to try it out locally, hands on, vs
shell (ssh) account access that I've used for years. Or, as you put
it, give it a 'whirl'
That's less taxing on it, and it can serve out the time it has left
before the mainboard and/or HD and/or PS goes south on me. I have no
intentions of continuing to keep this machine alive if it should
toast any of the aforementioned components. The HD is IDE based
(difficult for me to source a 'new' one locally), the mainboard has
been extinct for years now, and, I can't justify the cost of a new
power supply or my time to tear the machine down and replace it. It's
over a decade and a half old, depending on which copyright
date/firmware you're looking at. heh.
As far as the link itself, as I told you, when you used it to try and
dox me (you have a bad habit about doing that, but, whine like a
bitch when it's done correctly to you; double standard?) you've once
again, scored the wrong residence.
You've posted several addresses you thought were mine over the years.
You started with another one in kingsport with the title 'is this
your house Dustin' because I turned down your repeated! requests to
hack into a couple of specific web forums and provide you the user
records. You had/still have an issue with the forum administrators
and because you lack the ability to do anything on your own, tried
(and failed) to trick me into doing some absolutely, blackhat, shady
as fuck all, things on your behalf.
Because I declined, repeatedly, you tried to dox me for my trouble.
I'd done nothing nefarious of any kind to you prior to you trying it
with me, first. And, when I decided to go ahead and dox you good (via
scene release .nfo files), it was over two years! later. And, as I
recall (I can pull the MID for your reply, if you'd like), you
claimed I'd be in serious trouble for doing it. So, knowing I
wouldn't be in any trouble, I went ahead with the doxing for you. I
did ask if you knew what an .nfo file was beforehand. :)
> The property is built on a slope and your 'Lab' is located at the
> back, isn't it? Google knows all, Dustin! ;-)
Actually, no. I've been quite candid concerning the property where my
lab is located. I discussed equipment sitting outside, a large work
garage that's not attached to the house, etc. And, especially
important to me, my dust (no pun intended) problem due to a lack of
grass problem. Which, I'm happy to report, My efforts to seed grass
is showing results. At the rate it's growing, I might even get to mow
it once or twice before the fall. This *should* greatly reduce the
dust problem; My heavy machinery doesn't like it.
I even went so far as to mention that I spent sometime spraying one
of my pieces of equipment with a water hose; because it was yellow
when I put it where it is, and, I knew rust didn't turn it a shit
brown color that fast.
Google knows much, but, all simply isn't possible. It learns new
things every day. As it's still having to learn/store data, it can't
know 'all' Maybe one day, though. Doubtful, but, maybe.
As far as google having a gsv of my actual meatspace, I tried it this
morning with my actual physical address; it doesn't recognize it. As
I also mentioned having no neighbors near me, and having to make sure
I don't run near empty (or I won't be getting back to civilization),
it's pretty obvious the url you've shared doesn't have my house in
it. They seem to have neighbors, real close. I couldn't fire my guns
off my back porch, on either level, if I had neighbors that close to
me. Local law here.
Where could I possibly keep a backhoe, skid, and bobcat in the url
you shared, outside, David? Or, my military surplus diesel
generators? How about my pile of copper wire and other metals that I
keep an eye on with digital video cameras. I see no place to store
any of that stuff with the url you shared. But, if I walk outside, I
can see my stuff (I can always just look up and see it on a video
screen too, but, that's besides the point) Oh, and one more thing, I
didn't claim to live at the place where the short video was created,
either. And, if you think my lab is that small, computer wise, you're
a bigger idiot than I already know you to be. Plus, we have the age
of the video to consider. I intentionally created it using a low
quality camera, and, I did some post production work to make the
video that much more degraded (on a PC, never a mac!), but, not to
the point where it was completely unwatchable. And finally, I used a
lossy codec (XviD) to create the resulting avi file that you retained
and attempted to alter further on a mac, when you managed to lose the
entire audio track, and somehow, work from your master copy; thereby,
fucking yourself quite nicely in the process.
I did provide you a copy of the same file that you illegally retained
from my website though. The thing is, as you've learned, the .zip
file itself is encrypted, and, you can't seem to locate anyone with
enough smarts to break the cypher and unlock the contents for you.
It's been over a year now. Any progress? Rhetorical question. If you
could (or someone you know could) decrypt the .zip and get to the
video for you, that's what you would have used on your youtube
channel. As you've also learned, the encryption isn't the built in
stuff typical archiving apps can use, either.
And as you've freely shared with everybody, you've also learned that
miekemos (the lead malware researcher for Malwarebytes) *IS*
incompetent with regard to anything that's not script/macro based.
As, that's her only field of 'expertise' and, I use the term, very
loosely. I can't tell you how much I laughed my ass off when I
learned who it was that was trying to help you out. That doesn't say
much for the companies ability to actually keep you safe from modern
threats. Which is what I've been writing about them for years. You,
being the wannabe that you actually are, only helped to CONFIRM what
I'd already been writing about the companies realistic abilities.
They have a kickass, dishonest as hell, marketing/advertising/pr
group, but, the seme cannot be said for their other departments.
Which is why I advise people not to drink the koolaid and replace
their antivirus program with the Malwarebytes package. As, the
Malwarebytes program doesn't have the right type of crew with a solid
coding background to be able to make good on the claims. They'll have
to either hire competent coders capable of reverse engineering
malicious executables, or, buy out another smaller antivirus
antimalware company and rebrand it. Which is exactly what they did to
create the mac version. :)
The coder recruitment problem they have stems from how things are
hanlded internally. They offend more than they help, and, can't keep
many good coders on payroll as a result. But, hey, Marcin does win
awards and he's a good talker in public. I bet he could sell a
truckload of ice to an eskimo. That's something, right? :)
--
I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet.
Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.